fbpx
Hotline:0814535828

Reasons for disqualifications

Below is a collection of reasons for disqualification as listed by various entities in their bid award notice. Please make use of this information to ensure that your next bid submission is competitive.

Company (buyer)Cited Reason for disqualification of bidders
Lüderitz Town CouncilBidder did not submit a valid certificate company registration with BIPA
Lüderitz Town CouncilBidder did not submit good standing certificate with BIPA.
Lüderitz Town CouncilBidder did not submit manufacturers authorization.
Lüderitz Town CouncilBidder did not submit good standing certificate with BIPA.
Lüderitz Town CouncilMeter maintenance unit: The meter cannot be maintained; the whole unit can only be replaced therefore it does not comply with the specifications.
Erongo Regional CouncilCompany registration certificate not certified
Erongo Regional CouncilNo Bid Declaration.
Erongo Regional CouncilNo written undertaking.
Communications Regulatory Authority of NamibiaSubmitted a valid uncertified copy of business registration documents
Communications Regulatory Authority of NamibiaFailed to submit a valid fitness certificate from one of the towns/municipalities in the business area the bidder is bidding for and lease agreement agreement/title deed.
Communications Regulatory Authority of NamibiaFailed to provide three (3) reference letters on a company letter head from previous institutions with at least (5) years experience in providing services of a similar nature.
Communications Regulatory Authority of NamibiaFailed to provide evidence of Namibian identity documents IDs of shareholders
Communications Regulatory Authority of NamibiaDid not meet the requirements of this bid which is reserved for entities incorporated in Namibia with 51% shareholding or equity vesting in Namibian citizen's because they failed to provide proof of Namibian citizenship by submitting certified copies of identity documents.
Communications Regulatory Authority of NamibiaSubmitted a valid uncertified (not fully certified) proof from employment equity commissioner that bidder is not a relevant employer. The document submitted only had the Namibian police date stamp.
NamPowerBid submission form: Not as per BF1-2: Combined Bid Submission Form completed instead of each JV partner.
NamPower Incomplete Schedule of Prices: BoQ for Foundations not completed.
NamPowerBid Securing Declaration: Combined Bid Securing Declaration completed instead of each JV partner.
NamPowerAffirmative Action Compliance: Supeco Trading CC has 74 employees registered with the Social Security Commission (SSC) and 25 employees indicated in the Employment Equity Commission letter.
NamPowerDeclaration of Authenticity: Combined Declaration of Authenticity completed instead of each JV partner.
NamPower Covenant of Integrity: Combined Covenant of Integrity completed instead of each JV Partner. g) Performance Security Undertaking: Not stamped by the Bank.
NamPowerMinimum qualification criteria for general experience
NamPowerMinimum qualification criteria for specific experience not met: Only building and roads construction experience.
NamPowerMinimum technical evaluation score of 70 % not attained. Scored 62% obtained.
NamPowerPerformance Security Undertaking issued by Bank is not in accordance with Bidding Form BF1-21.
NamPowerPerformance Security Undertaking issued by DBN is not stamped by the Bank as per the requirements of Bidding Form BF1-21
NamPowerConflict of interest as per ITB 5.3. The site agent for Palladium is also participating bidder with Wecca Investment JV Supeco Trading Enterprises.
NamPowerBidder failed to indicate on the Bid Submission Form 1-2 whether they are a Government Owned Entity or not.
NamPowerThe original Social Security expired before the closing date
NamPowerA valid certified copy of proof from the Employment Equity Commissioner that the Bidder is not a relevant employer or exemption issued in terms of Section 42 of the Affirmative Action Act, 1998, was found to have expired, and no letter was provided indicating that the Bidder applied for a renewal.
NamPowerThe Bidder failed to provide sufficient evidence of credit facilities of up to a minimum of N$ 750,000.
NamPowerThe Bidder’s financial statements indicated turnover from construction activities of less than N$ 1 million per year over the past three years
NamPowerThe Bidder’s Specific Experience in terms of structural steelwork is not considered sufficient.
NamPowerThe Bidder’s Specific Experience in terms of cladding and sheeting of at least 500 m2 at a Namibian coastal site is not considered sufficient. The bidder’s indicated experience is not at a coastal site
NamPowerThe Bidder submitted a letter indicating that a subcontractor would be engaged. However, this letter was not in the prescribed format, and the subcontractor did not acknowledge this letter.
NamPowerBidder Scored 69% on technical evaluation.
NamPowerDid not submit the following documents or meet the requirements as was detailed in the bidding document: -Company registration certificate is a copy of certified copy.
NamPowerDid not submit the following documents or meet the requirements as was detailed in the bidding document: -Letter from Employment Equity Commission not certified.
NamPowerDid not submit the following documents or meet the requirements as was detailed in the bidding document: - Duly completed and signed SelfDeclaration not provided.
NamPowerDid not submit the following documents or meet the requirements as was detailed in the bidding document: - Power of attorney for Bidder’s representative not provided.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilBidder quoted higher than responsive bidder.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilSsc reference number is incorrect.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilPages not Initialed and page 8 not fully completed.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilEmployment equity is expired.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilPage 1-5 of founding statement not attached and Page 10 of bid document not fully completed.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilBidder quoted higher than a responsive bidder.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilPage 2,4,5,6,7 of the founding statement not certified.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilBidder did not quote for all the required items and page 3 of the bidding document is incomplete.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilBidders document incomplete and lase of the founding statement not fully certified.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilBidders business principle not in line.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilIncomplete pages 25;33
Oshikoto Regional CouncilOnly attached one valid reference letter. The second refence letter attached is the notification of award. A notification of is a bidders appointment letter and cannot be regarded as a reference letter, as it does not indicate if the project was successfully completed or not.
Oshikoto Regional Council no evidence of adequate working capital
Oshikoto Regional Council No authority to seek refence from the bank
Oshikoto Regional CouncilNo unit price: Lot C.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilSelected all sites in one bidding document.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilNo financial statement.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilNo major items.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilNo ID copy.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilAbove cost estimates.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilBelow cost estimates.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilBidder quoted higher than the lowest responsive bidder.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilNo prices indicated in the bid document
Oshikoto Regional CouncilNo certified copies of social security commission
Oshikoto Regional CouncilNo initialed: Page 20
Oshikoto Regional CouncilNo qualifications of key personnel
Oshikoto Regional CouncilNo affirmative action compliance document for bidder
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder attached an incomplete copy of company registration certificate (principal business is not attached).
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder attached annexure for description of principal business is not authenticated by the ministry of trade and Industry or BIPA.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder attached copy of affirmative action compliance certificate that expired on the 06th August 2021
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesThe company's business principal is not in line with tents selling as required. They registered for business consultation, building, road construction and maintenance, liquor license consultation, civil engineering, electrical services, security services, carpentry and joinery, restaurant and catering services, etc.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder did not attach letter of reference of similar work done.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder did not attach bank rating of a bidders financial position or credit worthiness from a financial institution or supplier of a bidder.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder did not attach copy of fitness certificate from local authority
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesCompany's delivery period of 8-12 weeks is not fair and reasonable and will render the Ministry not to be assessed by the external assessor, South Africa development community accreditation services (SADCAS) for ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accreditation which is due on28 March 2022.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder could not be evaluated further as they did not attach their proof of site visit.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder only attached the tenant rental agreement
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesDelivery period not stated as requested.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder made Correction on page 10 and 11 of price schedule but not initialed.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesPage 7 and 8 the table for technical criteria is incomplete
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesThe letter/s of reference of similar work done e.g., purchase order, correct certified invoice or delivery note.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesCopy of a valid affirmative action compliance certificate attached is not certified by the Namibian police.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesNot VAT eligible hence not lowest
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesNot comply -(the offer 2157NM@1100RPM instead of less than 2200NM@1400RPM, not comply-(GCM =65 000KG instead of GCM should not be less than 70 000KG and offering delivery period of to 12 weeks due to covid -19 pandemic.
Ministry of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment CreationBidder information form and bid submission form not completed.
Ministry of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment CreationNo brochure and SME
Ministry of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment CreationNo SME certificate attached & No initials
Ministry of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment CreationNo testimonials attached
Ministry of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment CreationSpecial conditions of contract not completed.
Ministry of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment CreationSome of the items are not quoted.
Ministry Of Agriculture, Water and Land ReformCommercially non-responsiveness
Ministry Of Agriculture, Water and Land ReformTechnically non-responsiveness.
Ministry of Works and TransportBid Securing Declaration was not signed and stamped
Ministry of Works and TransportCompany did not submit an electronic copy of the bid
Ministry of Works and TransportThe prices offered by bidder are not fixed as required under ITB 14.7 which states that unless otherwise specified in the BDS, prices quoted by the Bidder shall be fixed during the Bidder’s performance of the Contract and not subject to increases on any account. Bids submitted that are subject to price adjustment will be rejected.
Ministry of Works and TransportPrices offered by bidder is subjected to change as their Option 2 requires that any increases of RoE of more than 2% requires price adjustments.
Ministry of Works and Transport5% contingency is not mentioned in the bid of bidder but only in the financial offers.
Ministry of Works and TransportThe validity of the Option 1 is 180 days from the 1st April 2021. This validity period has already expired. Refer to Vol B page 18 of 20.
Ministry of Works and TransportBased on the verification of the submitted documentary evidence request in ITB Clause the Ad Hoc Evaluation Committee has concluded that the bids offered by Central Technical Supplies and Teltech are not responsive pursuant to ITB Clause. Therefore, they have been excluded from further evaluation and comparison.
Ministry of Works and TransportCompany did not submit an electronic copy of the bid for Option 1 and Option 2 no hard copies and no electronic copy
NAMFISABidder did not meet the minimum technical score requirement
NAMFISABidder did not partake in Lot 3
Office of the JudiciaryBidder is disqualified for falling to attach a valid good standing social security and failed to attach the fitness certificate.
Office of the JudiciaryThe bidder failed to dully complete page 1 O and 11 of the bidding document.
Office of the JudiciaryThe notary power of attorney was not attached.
Office of the JudiciaryThe signatory is not duly authorized, given the absence of the power of attorney.
Office of the JudiciaryThe bidder is not considered for price comparison given its failure to attach a fitness certificate.
Office of the JudiciaryBidder did not attach the good standing tax certificate
Office of the JudiciaryBidder did not attach the social security good standing certificate and affirmative action compliance certificate / letter / exemption.
Office of the JudiciaryBidder did not duly complete all spaces provided on the price activity schedule, specifications and performances standard compliance sheet.
Office of the JudiciaryThe bidder is not in the business of recording, transcriptions, binding and copying.
Office of the JudiciaryBidder failed to sign a written undertaking.
Office of the JudiciaryAlthough the bidder is in good standing, the bidder is disqualified given its failure to complete page 9, 10 and 11 of the bidding document.
Office of the JudiciaryBidder is disqualified due to invalid certificate of fitness.
Office of the JudiciaryThough the bidder was responsive and the lowest, it could not be considered for award or contract since it does not poses the necessary machines for printing receipt books.
Office of the JudiciaryThe bidder is disqualified for failure to attach a certified copy of letter from the employment equity commissioner.
Office of the JudiciaryThe bidder is disqualified for failure to dully complete the compliance sheet.
Office of the JudiciaryThe bidder was not considered for price comparison given the fact that the latter is not in the business of servicing fire extinguishers.
Ohangwena Regional CouncilBidder did not comply with section 138 (2) of the labor act, 2007 ( Act 11 of 2007)
Ohangwena Regional CouncilNature of the business in the good standing certificate with social security commission is not in line with the procurement requested
Ohangwena Regional CouncilThe affirmative action compliance certificate is not attached.
Ohangwena Regional CouncilThe employment equity commission certificate attached is expired.
Ohangwena Regional CouncilBidder quoted higher than the lowest responsive bidder (Amount without VAT)
Ohangwena Regional CouncilBidder attached wrong ( receipt) proof of payment.
Ohangwena Regional CouncilBidder not comply with ITB 38.2 (a)
Ohangwena Regional CouncilBidders nature of business in good standing certificate with social security commission is not in line with the procurement requested.
Ohangwena Regional CouncilQuotation validity period and works completion period provided differs with the requested period.
Ohangwena Regional CouncilBidder already awarded the contract for Lot A.
Ohangwena Regional CouncilBidder quoted all lots.
Ohangwena Regional CouncilBidders quotation validity 30 days instead of 90 days
Roads AuthorityBidder obtained lowest tender index score
Roads AuthorityBidder has not initiated corrections on the price schedule form.
Roads AuthorityBidder has not duly filled in the price schedule form. Delivery and country of origin left blank.
Roads AuthorityBidder indicated bid validity of 30 days which is not in accordance to the requirements of 120 days stipulated in section 1 clause 3.
Roads AuthorityBidder has not submitted any brochures or literate to confirm the products in accordance to ITB section 1, clause 11 (c) and 12.
Roads AuthorityBidder has not submitted reference letters in accordance to ITB section I, clause 11(d) to substantiate past experiences.
Swakopmund MunicipalityBidder only provided proof of relevant experience for one project.
Swakopmund MunicipalityRelevant experience documents not provided
Swakopmund MunicipalityNo evident of survey equipment and backhoe loader provided
Swakopmund MunicipalityNo proof of ownership.
Swakopmund MunicipalityBidder did not submit local authority registration certificates for both companies listed in the joint venture agreement
Swakopmund MunicipalityHealth and safety program not provided.
Swakopmund MunicipalityPrice schedule not dully completed.
Swakopmund MunicipalityOutdated and irrelevant proof of experience
Swakopmund MunicipalityGood standing tax certificate expired.
Swakopmund MunicipalityPrice offered is too low.
Swakopmund MunicipalityBidders vehicle registration certificate not attached.
Swakopmund MunicipalityA valid letter or certificate from the ministry of finance inland revenue indicating that NO VAT registration is required not attached.
Swakopmund MunicipalityNo proof of accredited vehicle dealership.
Swakopmund MunicipalityManufacturer authorization letter not attached.
Swakopmund MunicipalityIncomplete specifications and compliance sheet - page 17, 19, 20.
Swakopmund MunicipalityPage 23 - GCC8.1 - incomplete.
Swakopmund MunicipalityDelivery only till Windhoek.
Swakopmund MunicipalityCopy of valid company registration certificate not certified.
Swakopmund MunicipalityCopy of valid social security good standing certificate not certified.
Swakopmund MunicipalityCopy of valid registration certificate of local authority not certified.
Swakopmund MunicipalityAttached catalogue specs: Flow rate only 270-650 L/H; only 30-160MPA
Swakopmund MunicipalityColor copy of employer status letter from EEC
NamWaterThe manufacturers authorization letter submitted was not signed by the manufacturer or its representative.
NamWaterCopy of the good standing certificate - SSC, Good standing certificate inland revenue and affirmative action compliance certificate submitted are not certified.
NamWaterNo gearbox supporting literature attached, therefore technical compliance claims cannot be substantiated.
MEATCO NamibiaThe bidder met the requirements and proceeded to the next stage of the evaluation process.
MEATCO NamibiaThe bidder failed to submit public liability insurance and goods in transit insurance cover of N$ 2 million.
MEATCO NamibiaThe bidder failed to submit a lease agreement for the proposed trucks.
MEATCO NamibiaBidder failed to submit certified company registration documents
MEATCO NamibiaBidder failed to submit certified identification documents (ID) of managing members/ directors/ shareholders.
MEATCO NamibiaBidder failed to submit a valid original or certified copy of Good standing tax certificate
MEATCO NamibiaBidder failed to submit a valid certified copy of the affirmative action compliance certificate
MEATCO NamibiaBidder failed to submit certified copies of the vehicle registration certificates or a lease agreement for the proposed trucks.
MEATCO NamibiaBidder failed to submit certified copies of the drivers driving licenses.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilBidders page 6 incomplete
Oshikoto Regional CouncilFitness or recent water bill for Lot B and C not attached
Oshikoto Regional CouncilWater bill attached not for the bidder and there is no lease agreement
Oshikoto Regional CouncilLot A, no existing car wash as water is not available and Lot C, quoted higher than the successful bidder
Oshikoto Regional CouncilPage 5 and 8 not initialed.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilInvalid affirmative action compliance certificate
Oshikoto Regional CouncilThe car wash provided for inspection is not the one in the bidders document.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilAccount confirmation from Namibian banking institute not attached.
Oshikoto Regional CouncilPrices corrections not initialed.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesScored 56% instead of 70% or above on the technical specifications as required
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesCorrection made and not initiated on page 22 of bill of quantities.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesPages 1-12 of bill of quantities are not completed.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesThey are not the most responsive offer to the items not awarded to them.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesItem 1 and 2 not recommend due to no ex-stock in WHK
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesThe bidder failed to attach a manufacturer authorization letter and quotation is not typed as required.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder failed to attach a proof of warehouse.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder failed to attach similar work/experience
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder was not available for physical verification of stock
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder failed to attach a stamped letter of intent finance.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder could not considered as they did not complete the register as required.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder failed to certify the valid fitness certificate
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder attached a valid fitness certificate for grand Africa investments cc.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder did not bid in line with their founding statement.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder did not type the response form.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder failed to attach an original valid good standing tax certificate. Additionally, quotation is not typed as required.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesItem 1 not recommended due to wrong specifications (powder free).
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder is not the most responsive offer for items not awarded to them due to no ex stock and long delivery period.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesCorrections made and not initialed on price schedule (page 10) of the bid document.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesLetter of intents from a financial institution or supplier of a bidder to finance or supply the bidder is not attached.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder attached copy of fitness certificate expired on 09-02-2017
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder is not in line with business principal of fumigation services/work as required.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesPage 102-149 of the Bills of Quantity are incomplete (Not priced).
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesTax certificate attached expired on 12.01.2022 before closing date which was the 14.01.2022.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesPage 21 table 1 bullet point 2, says all bidders must be incorporated in Namibia, with 100% equity owned by Namibian citizens. The owners are not Namibians as per the attached passports.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBusiness principle not in line with construction
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesDid not submit the bidding document and bill of quantity and this was confirmed at opening, they only submitted the mandatory and supporting documents.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesBidder did not quote for all items since request was advertised as a Lot.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesThe validity period of the bid lapsed.
Ministry of Health and Social ServicesSome bidders value exceeded the public entity threshold.
NIPAM(Namibia Institute for Public Administration and Management)Bidder failed to submit a certified copy of affirmative action compliance certificate or exemption in terms of section 42 of affirmative action Act. 1998 thereof issued by employment equity commission.
Electricity Control Board(ECB)Is disqualified for not complying with section 8(c)(iv) of the Terms of Reference. This section disqualifies bidders who include financial information and financial annexures in the technical bid. section 9.2 of the ToR clearly stipulates that the Financial Proposal must be submitted in a separate sealed envelope. The technical proposal contained both technical and financial information, annexure 2 (Price declaration form) which included the costs.
Electricity Control Board(ECB)Did not meet the minimum technical score requirement of 52.5 instead their score is 46.6
Electricity Control Board(ECB)A total weighted score of 88. % overall making them the second preferred bidder both technically and financially.
Hardap Regional CouncilPage 25 not completed in full contract duration beyond 60 days (180 days)
Hardap Regional CouncilFailed technical scored below 70%
Hardap Regional CouncilCopy of company registration not fully certified, stamped but not signed by an officer.
Hardap Regional CouncilNo NSF on company letterhead attached
Hardap Regional CouncilBidder completed his bill in a typed version while the requirement clearly states that it should be in black ink pen.
Hardap Regional CouncilAfter arithmetic corrections the bidder did not make it to the estimated threshold lower bracket of 15% which is N$ 505,006.86 the correct price.
Hardap Regional CouncilNo proof of residence (Fitness certificate) not attached.
Hardap Regional CouncilBidder is within the lower bracket but was higher than the best evaluated bid based on the price.
Hardap Regional CouncilProof of reseller is not a distributor for leading ICT supply
Hardap Regional CouncilPg. 38 not completed(Minor) Brochure only showing one product(minor)
Hardap Regional CouncilBidders Pg. 47 BOQ not fully completed
Hardap Regional CouncilLetter from financing institution reference wrong tender number & contract
Hardap Regional CouncilNo CV of staff members & qualification attached
Hardap Regional CouncilPg. 5 3, List of related services & completion schedule not completed
Hardap Regional CouncilPg. 49, value added calculation not completed
Hardap Regional CouncilBidders SSC good standing doesn't reflect nature of business for the mentioned tender( minor)
Hardap Regional CouncilBidders Pg.4 have not indicated I or We
Karibib Town CouncilSubmitted an original document without a Copy
Ohangwena Regional CouncilNature of business of the business in good standing certificate with social security commissioner is not in line with the procurement requested
Ohangwena Regional CouncilThe bid is higher than the lowest evaluated responsive bidder
Ohangwena Regional CouncilBidder charged the VAT while not registered as a VAT vendor
Ohangwena Regional CouncilBidder didn't attend the compulsory site meeting
Ohangwena Regional CouncilBidder above the budget
Omuthiya Town CouncilScc tender number is incorrect
Omuthiya Town CouncilBidder quoted higher than responsive bidder
Omuthiya Town CouncilPage 1 of bid document not fully completed
Omuthiya Town CouncilPage 1-7 of founding statement not attached
Omuthiya Town CouncilBank confirmation, written undertaker, certificate of SME not attached.
Omuthiya Town CouncilPage 8 & 9 nit fully completed.
Roads AuthorityVAT certificate for bidder expired before bid submission date.
Office of the JudiciaryBidder is not considered for price evaluation due to its failure to attach a fitness certificate which serves as proof that the bidder is based in the region where the goods are required.
Office of the JudiciaryAlthough bidder is in goid standing, it was not considered for price comparison since the latter is not based in khomas region.
Office of the JudiciaryBidder is disqualified for: Attaching an uncertified copy of registration certificate, attaching an uncertified copy of letter of exemption from the employment equity commissioner, Bid securing declaration is incomplete
Office of the JudiciaryBid attaching a scanned color copy of fitness certificate
Office of the JudiciaryThe bidder is disqualified given its failure to dully complete the price schedule.
Office of the JudiciaryBidder is disqualified for failure to duly complete page 11 and 12 of the bidding document and failure to attach the fitness certificate and the principal of business is not indicated in the registration certificate.
City of WindhoekBidder did not attach a copy of affirmative action compliance certificate.
City of WindhoekThey have submitted an application with the employment equity, however approval is pending.
City of Windhoek Bidder attached an invalid certified copy of an original goid standing tax certificate
City of WindhoekThe bidder did not submit section III of the bidding document as required.
City of WindhoekBid no.2 scored 10 out of 75 marks (13.3%). The minimum pass mark for the technical evaluation shall be 70% and only those bids having scored at least the pass marks shall be retained for further evaluation.
Karibib Town CouncilNo JV agreement (Company profiles for Lithon Engineering Consultant and Envirotech solution)
Karibib Town CouncilOnly Signing Authority from Rent a Drum was submitted
Karibib Town CouncilDid not submit one copy of bidding document as required
Karibib Town CouncilNo JV agreement
Karibib Town CouncilOnly one Company registration certificate submitted
Karibib Town CouncilFitness certificate not submitted
Karibib Town CouncilDid not submit one copy of bidding document as required.
Karibib Town CouncilFitness certificate expired and not valid
Namibia Institute of Pathology Limited(NIP)Ownership could not be determined as only names of directors were listed.
Namibia Institute of Pathology Limited(NIP)Ownership could not be verified as no ID copies were attached
Namibia Institute of Pathology Limited(NIP)The bidder did not submit proof of his Namibian bank account
Namibia Institute of Pathology Limited(NIP)The bidder attached an expired fitness certificate
Namibia Institute of Pathology Limited(NIP)The bidder did not substantiate with registration certificate
Namibia Institute of Pathology Limited(NIP)The registered project engineer did not attach his qualifications, copy of ID and it was indicated that his work permit was valid but copy thereof was not attached either.
Namibia Institute of Pathology Limited(NIP)The bidder did not attach a registration certificate with the engineering council of namibia.
Namibia Institute of Pathology Limited(NIP)One of the joint venture partner did not attach copy of his ID.
Namibia Institute of Pathology Limited(NIP)The company was registered in 2018, as per the requirement of this bid, the bidder did not meet the five (5) years experience.
Namibia Institute of Pathology Limited(NIP)The bidder did not submit evidence of minimum average, annual financial amount of 75% of their bid price. Submitter a bank confirmation letter.
Office of the JudiciaryThe bidder is disqualified for failure to attach a valid good standing social security certificates.
Office of the JudiciaryThe bidder failed to conduct site visit at swakopmund.
Office of the JudiciaryThe bidder is disqualified for failure to attach a certified copy of certificate of fitness
Office of the JudiciaryAlthough the bidder is in good standing, the bidder is disqualified given its failure to complete page 10 and 11 of the bidding document and the latter is not in the business of servicing air conditioners or refrigeration.
Office of the JudiciaryThe bidder failed to conduct site visit at schonlein building and Supreme court.
Office of the JudiciaryBidder was not considered for price comparison since the latter is not in the business of servicing air conditioners or refrigeration.
Okahao Town CouncilBidder did not submit written confirmation of authorization signatory (power of attorney) as per ITB 12.1 (c).
Okahao Town CouncilCopy of bid document not submitted as per ITB 23.1.
Okahao Town CouncilDelivery of scheduled form on page 50 is not completed.
Okahao Town CouncilTotal bid price on the bid submission form is not indicated on page 38 section (c).
Okahao Town CouncilBidder did not submit affirmative action compliance certificate/proof from employment equity commissioner as requested under ITB 12.1 (h) (iv).
Okahao Town CouncilBidder did not initialiaze all pages.
Okahao Town CouncilBidder did not indicate availability of spare parts. Will not be considered for price comparison.
Okahao Town CouncilBidder did not attach manufacturer's authorization. Will not be considered for price comparison

We found 232 available tenders for you

Oilonga-Media Services

appointment-reminders

Tenders Alerts

Instant alerts of all tenders advertised in Namibia directly into your inbox. Updated Daily!

increase-profits

Tender Results

Simplified list of all available bid awards in Namibia. Updated daily for your convenience!

training

Tender Training

Become a tender expert by attending a series of our online and face to face workshops.

documents

Consultancy

Let our expert consultants develop a bid strategy and prepare your bid submissions.

About Us

Oilonga Tender Portal is an online database of all tenders advertised in the country. We search through newspapers, websites and social media to find and notify you of all opportunities available in your industry.

Number of tenders available for you right now